Innovative Approaches to Transtibial Prosthesis Design: A Review of Integrating Photogrammetry with Finite Element Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11594/nstp.2025.47100Keywords:
Transtibial prosthesis, photogrammetry, finite element analysis, prosthetic design, biomechanics, SDGs 3, SDGs9Abstract
The design and development of transtibial prostheses have advanced significantly with the integration of innovative technologies. This study explores a novel approach to transtibial prosthesis design by combining photogrammetry and finite element analysis (FEA). Photogrammetry is employed to capture the detailed geometry of a residual limb, ensuring a customized fit, while FEA is used to evaluate the mechanical performance of the prosthesis under various loading conditions. The integration of these technologies enables precise modeling and optimization of the prosthetic structure, focusing on enhancing comfort, durability, and biomechanical compatibility. Simulation results demonstrate the prosthesis's ability to withstand daily stresses with an optimal safety factor, reducing potential for discomfort and injury. By leveraging these innovative approaches, the study aligns with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly Goal 3 (Good Health and Well-Being) by improving the quality of life for amputees, and Goal 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure) by fostering technological advancements in medical device manufacturing. This interdisciplinary approach provides a framework for more personalized and efficient prosthesis design, contributing to global efforts in healthcare innovation and sustainable development.
Downloads
References
Afiqah Hamzah, N., Razak, N. A. A., Sayuti Ab Karim, M., & Gholizadeh, H. (2021). A review of history of CAD/CAM system application in the productionof transtibial prosthetic socket in developing countries (from 1980to 2019). Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 235(12), 1359–1374. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544119211035200
Alturkistani, R., Kavin, A., Devasahayam, S., Thomas, R., Colombini, E. L., Cifuentes, C. A., Homer- Vanniasinkam, S., Wurdemann, H. A., & Moazen, M. (2020). Affordable passive 3D-printed prosthesis for persons with partial hand amputation. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 44(2), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309364620905220
Arifin, N., Hasbollah, H. R., & Malaya, U. (2023). Job Scope Analysis Among Prosthetics and Orthotics Practitioners in Malaysia. Journal of Prosthetics Orthotics and Science Technology, 2(2), 40–44.. https://doi.org/10.36082/jpost.v2i2.1219
Barreto, M. A., Perez-gonzalez, J., Herr, H. M., & Huegel, J. C. (2022). ARACAM: A RGB-D Multi- View Photogrammetry System for Lower Limb 3D Reconstruction Applications. Sensors, 22(7), 2443; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22072443
Colombo, G., Facoetti, G., & Rizzi, C. (2013). A digital patient for computer-aided prosthesis design. Interface Focus, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2012.0082
Cutti, A. G., Santi, M. G., Hansen, A. H., & Fatone, S. (2024). Accuracy, Repeatability, and Reproducibility of a Hand-Held Structured-Light 3D Scanner across Multi-Site Settings in Lower Limb Prosthetics. Sensors, 24(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/s24072350
Dickinson, A., Diment, L., Morris, R., Pearson, E., Hannett, D., & Steer, J. (2021). Characterising Residual Limb Morphology and Prosthetic Socket Design Based on Expert Clinician Practice. Prosthesis, 3(4), 280-299. https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis3040027
Dickinson, A. S., Steer, J. W., Woods, C. J., & Worsley, P. R. (2016). Registering a methodology for imaging and analysis of residual-limb shape after transtibial amputation. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 53(2), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2014.10.0272
Dickinson, A. S., Steer, J. W., & Worsley, P. R. (2017a). Finite element analysis of the amputated lower limb: A systematic review and recommendations. Medical Engineering and Physics, 43, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.02.008
Dickinson, A. S., Steer, J. W., & Worsley, P. R. (2017b). Finite element analysis of the amputated lower limb: A systematic review and recommendations. Medical Engineering and Physics, 43(March), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.02.008
Diment, L. E., Thompson, M. S., & Bergmann, J. H. M. (2019). Comparing thermal discomfort with skin temperature response of lower-limb prosthesis users during exercise. Clinical Biomechanics, 69(July), 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.07.020
Eshraghi, A., Phillips, C., Mackay, C., Dilkas, S., Riondato, Z., Lehkyj, S., & Heim, W. (2024). Comparison of Socket Geometry, Socket Comfort, and Patient Experience between Manually- and Digitally-Designed Prosthetic Sockets for Lower-Limb Amputees: A Feasibility Study. Prosthesis, 6(3), 672-682. DOI:10.3390/prosthesis6030048
Galantucci, L. M., Guerra, M. G., & Lavecchia, F. (2018). Photogrammetry Applied to Small and Micro Scaled Objects: A Review. Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on the Industry 4.0 Model for Advanced Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319- 89563-5
Golovin, M. A., Marusin, N. V., & Golubeva, Y. B. (2018). Use of 3D Printing in the Orthopedic Prosthetics Industry. Biomedical Engineering, 52(2), 100–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10527- 018-9792-1
González, A. K., Rodríguez-reséndiz, J., Gonzalez-durán, J. E. E., Manuel, J., Ramírez, O., & Estévez- bén, A. A. (2023). Development of a Hip Joint Socket by Finite-Element-Based Analysis for Mechanical Assessment. Bioengineering, 10(2), 268; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10020268
Kumari, P., Manchikatla, S., & Kdv, P. (2017). Digital Manufacturing- Applications Past, Current, and Future Trends. Procedia Engineering, 174, 982–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.250
Lee, D. R. C., Herr, H., & Winter, A. (2022). Design and clinical evaluation of a digital transtibial prosthetic interface (Issue 2020).
Paternò, L., Ibrahimi, M., Gruppioni, E., Menciassi, A., & Ricotti, L. (2018). Sockets for limb prostheses: A review of existing technologies and open challenges. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 65(9), 1996–2010. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2017.2775100
Pirouzi, G., Abu Osman, N. A., Eshraghi, A., Ali, S., Gholizadeh, H., & Wan Abas, W. A. B. (2014). Review of the socket design and interface pressure measurement for transtibial prosthesis. Scientific World Journal, 2014, 849073. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/849073
Price, M. A., Beckerle, P., & Sup, F. C. (2019). Design Optimization in Lower Limb Prostheses: A Review. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering: A Publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 27(8), 1574–1588. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2927094
Raschke, S. U. (2022). Limb Prostheses: Industry 1.0 to 4.0: Perspectives on Technological Advances in Prosthetic Care. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences, 3(March), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2022.854404
Ribeiro, P., Mar, C., Blanca, R., Vicente, R., & Cam, C. A. D. (2024). Stereo-Photogrammetry for Impression of Full-Arch Fixed Dental Prosthesis — An Update of the Reviews. Prosthesis, 6(4), 939-951; https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis6040068.
Schober, T., & Abrahamsen, C. (2022). Patient perspectives on major lower limb amputation – A qualitative systematic review. International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing, 46, 100958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijotn.2022.100958
Seminati, E., Talamas, D. C., Young, M., Twiste, M., Dhokia, V., & Bilzon, J. L. J. (2017). Validity and reliability of a novel 3D scanner for assessment of the shape and volume of amputees’ residual limb models. PLoS ONE, 12(9), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184498
Steer, J. W., Worsley, P. R., Browne, M., & Dickinson, A. S. (2020). Predictive prosthetic socket design: part 1—population-based evaluation of transtibial prosthetic sockets by FEA-driven surrogate modelling. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, 19(4), 1331–1346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-019-01195-5
Weathersby, E. J., Vamos, A. C., Larsen, B. G., Mclean, J. B., Carter, R. V, Allyn, K. J., Ballesteros, D., Wang, H., Nicholas, S., Friedly, J. L., Hafner, B. J., Garbini, J. L., Ciol, M. A., & Sanders, J. E. (2022). Performance of an auto-adjusting prosthetic socket during walking with intermittent socket release. Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering, 9, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683221093271
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this proceedings agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the Nusantara Science and Technology Proceedings right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this proceeding.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the proceedings published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this proceeding.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Share
