Formulating Policy Alternatives for Enhancing Sugarcane Production and Farmer Incomes: A Case Study in East Java

Authors

  • Noor Rizkiyah Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Surabaya 60294, Indonesia
  • Fatchur Rozci Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Surabaya 60294, Indonesia
  • Aditya Arief Rachmadhan Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Surabaya 60294, Indonesia
  • Prasmita Dian Wijayati Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Surabaya 60294, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11594/nstp.2025.4910

Keywords:

Economic behavior, policy simulations, sugarcane farming

Abstract

This study examines the economic behavior of sugarcane farming households in East Java, focusing on their decision-making regarding ratoon removal, a crucial practice for maintaining optimal yields. Using an economic model, the research evaluates the effectiveness of policies aimed at increasing sugarcane production and improving farmers' incomes, including replanting intensity, seed price subsidies, and non-food consumption subsidies. Policy simulations reveal that the most effective strategy for boosting production is a combination of a 25% increase in replanting intensity and a 15% subsidy for non-food consumption. Similarly, for enhancing incomes, the same policy proves most effective, followed by a 25% fertilizer price increase paired with a 20% seed price subsidy. These findings underscore the importance of integrated policy measures that address both input costs and household expenses to maximize productivity and income, offering valuable insights for policymakers supporting smallholder sugarcane farmers and sustainable agricultural practices in East Java.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amri, A. (2020). Dampak covid-19 terhadap UMKM di Indonesia. J. Brand, 2(1), 123–130, 2020

Dila, M. R., Yunitasari, D., & Komariyah, S. (2024). Analisis Faktor Produksi Terhadap Usahatani Tebu di Kabupaten Jember,” Pros. Semin. Nas. Terap. Ris. Inov., 9(2), 48–59.

Jannah, E. M., Rachmadhan, A. A., Meidaliyantisyah, & Hendra, J. (2022). Factors affecting the smallholder sugarcane plantation area. J. Penelit. Pertan. Terap., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 155–168, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.25181/jppt.v22i2.2238.

Lestari, E. K., Fauzi, A., Hutagaol, M. P., & Hidayat, A. (2016). Analysis of sugarcane farming in the sugar mill District Semboro Jember, Indonesia: A data envelopment analysis application,” Int. J. Sci. Basic Appl. Res., 25(2), 157–171.

Lukitasari, N. (2017). Evaluasi efektivitas distribusi pupuk bersubsidi ke petani di Kota Bogor (Studi Kasus: Kelompok Tani Fajar Gumbira). Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Nurasa, C. T., & Setiadjie, I. (2008). Dampak kebijakan perdagangan gula terhadap profitabilitas usahatani tebu: Kasus di Kabupaten Klaten, Jawa Tengah. Bul. Ilm. Litbang Perdagang., 2(2), 264–286. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.30908/bilp.v2i2.176.

Rachmadhan, A. A., Kusnadi, N., & Adhi, A. K. (2020). Analisis harga eceran gula kristal putih Indonesia. Bul. Ilm. Litbang Perdagang., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.30908/bilp.v14i1.433.

Rachmadhan, R. R., Kusnadi, N., & Adhi, A. K. (2020). Pengaruh kebijakan subsidi pupuk terhadap produksi gula kristal putih Indonesia. J. Agro Ind. Perkeb., 8(1), 9–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.25181/jaip.v8i1.1266.

Zainuddin, B. A., & Wibowo, R. (2018). Analisis potensi produksi tebu dengan pendekatan fungsi produksi frontir di PT Perkebunan Nusantara X. J. Pangan, 27(1), 33–42. doi: 10.33964/jp.v27i1.404.

Downloads

Published

14-06-2025

How to Cite

Rizkiyah, N., Rozci, F., Rachmadhan, A. A., & Wijayati, P. D. (2025). Formulating Policy Alternatives for Enhancing Sugarcane Production and Farmer Incomes: A Case Study in East Java. Nusantara Science and Technology Proceedings, 2025(49), 79-82. https://doi.org/10.11594/nstp.2025.4910

Similar Articles

1-10 of 304

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.