A Systematic Literature Review of Factors Caused Academic Fraud Behavior
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11594/nstp.2019.0402Keywords:
pentagon theory, GONE theory, academic fraud behavior, literature reviewAbstract
This study uses the literature review method because it aims to analyze the factors that cause academic fraud behavior by looking at the fraud theory used and the research method approach. The factors examined include the theory of the pentagon dimension proposed by Jonathan Marks in 2012 and the GONE theory coined by Jack Bologna in 1992. Pentagon theory has five factors namely pressure, opportunity, rationalization, ability, and arrogance. While the GONE theory is four factors, namely Greed, Opportunity, Need, and Expose. In this study, several journals have been examined related to the theory of the pentagon dimension and the GONE theory so that it can be concluded that there is pressure because students want high grades and the desire to graduate immediately. Besides, the opportunity students have, to do academic cheating and rationalization that making the idea that fraud academic behavior is common. Those three factors are most influential in academic fraud behavior. With this conclusion, it can be suggested to lecturers to optimize learning methods that combine hard skills and soft skills to prevent academic fraud behavior to happen.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this proceedings agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the Nusantara Science and Technology Proceedings right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this proceeding.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the proceedings published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this proceeding.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access).
