Ethics in Learning: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11594/nstp.2023.3392Keywords:
Ethics in learning, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMAAbstract
Researchers have used a systematic literature review to map the existing research, find existing knowledge of any field, and its gaps, and finally suggest possible future research. However, few studies assessing the nature and quality of systematic review papers published in the ethics and learning literature have been conducted. In this study, we use a list of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) to systematically review the systematic review article on ethics in learning. We used data from crossref and google scholars indexed journals in the last decade from 2013 to 2022. We employed the terms “ethics, learning, and review” to obtain the ethics in learning review articles. The results of this study will provide researchers on how the review literature procedures have been conducted. This study not only will enhance our understanding of the procedures followed by scholars in doing systematic reviews, but also illustrate some limitations in the design, method, and implementation of current systematic reviews.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Endah Susilowati, Diah Hari Suryaningrum, Sari Andayani, Wulandari Hidayanti, Dana Puspitasari, Brian Bayu Ramadhan, St. Rohmawatik, Zakharia Vito Trinova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this proceedings agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the Nusantara Science and Technology Proceedings right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this proceeding.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the proceedings published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this proceeding.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access).
